Some bird species may be protected from climate change by old-growth forests and managed forests with old-growth traits, according to research from the Oregon State University College of Forestry.
Hankyu Kim, a former doctoral candidate at Oregon State University, built on earlier research led by Matt Betts, a professor in the Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, that demonstrated how some bird species that are threatened by climate change can find refuge in old forests with large trees and a variety of tree species and sizes.
According to the scientists, the most recent findings have significant implications for conservation choices involving mature forests and are even more pertinent in light of the new Inflation Reduction Act, which calls for increased funding to map and safeguard the United States’ remaining old-growth forests.
The study, which was released today in Global Change Biology, examined “microclimates” in forests. Microclimates are unique local climatic conditions that exist in places as small as a few square meters up to many square kilometers.
Microclimates tend to be most pronounced in areas of rugged and varied topography such as coastal areas, islands and mountains like Oregon’s Cascade Range, home to the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest where Kim and Betts did their research.
In addition to subcanopy temperature measurements, ground- and LiDAR-based vegetation data, and eight years’ worth of breeding bird abundance data from a HJ Andrews watershed, the OSU researchers also worked with collaborators from Oregon State and the United States Forest Service. They came to the conclusion that some bird species tended to perform better in areas with colder microclimates, a phenomena they refer to as the “buffering effect.”
Because compositional diversity helps ensure the existence of the insects the birds eat when they most require nutrition and energy during breeding season, some species also fared better in areas where the forest had more compositional diversity. This benefit is known as the “insurance effect.”
Trends of abundance of five species declined at greater rates in warmer locations than in cooler areas. That suggests microclimates within forested landscapes do provide refugia for those species. Declining species that are sensitive to warm conditions, like the Wilson’s warbler, hermit warbler and chestnut-backed chickadee, seemed to benefit the most from refugia effects.Hankyu Kim
“To my knowledge, this is the first empirical evidence of any microclimate effect on songbird populations, and of the insurance effect on free-ranging birds,” said Kim, now a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. “Each species may have a slightly different range of thermal optima the range of thermal conditions they feel comfortable with and it could be the same for the interaction between forest ecosystems and birds.”
He explained that some birds interact with the forest ecology under the current warming regime to their advantage, while others would find it challenging to reproduce there since the supply of food has altered negatively.
The researchers discovered that in colder microclimates, abundance trends for five of the 20 bird species they studied tended to be either neutral or less negative, and that the adverse effects of warming on two species were lessened in areas with greater forest compositional diversity.
The Swainson’s thrush, chestnut-backed chickadee, hermit warbler, variegated thrush, and Wilson’s warbler were the five species that benefited from the buffering effect. The only two species with statistical proof that they benefited from the insurance effect were the Wilson’s warbler and the red crossbill.
“If plants leaf out earlier in warm microclimates, causing arthropods to emerge earlier, there is a danger of migratory birds mistiming their breeding with peak food availability,” Betts said. “Since leaf-out timing varies by plant species, forests with more plant diversity often have a longer period of insect availability.”
The other 14 birds in the analyses were the dark-eyed junco, hermit thrush, McGillivray’s warbler, Pacific-slope flycatcher, brown creeper, black-throated gray warbler, golden-crowned kinglet, Hammond’s flycatcher, hairy woodpecker, Pacific wren, red-breasted nuthatch, red-breasted sapsucker, western tanager and yellow-rumped warbler.
Seven of the 20 species showed overall declines in abundance over the eight-year study, 2011-18. Nine showed increases and four did display a detectable trend.
“Trends of abundance of five species declined at greater rates in warmer locations than in cooler areas,” Kim said. “That suggests microclimates within forested landscapes do provide refugia for those species. Declining species that are sensitive to warm conditions, like the Wilson’s warbler, hermit warbler and chestnut-backed chickadee, seemed to benefit the most from refugia effects.”
Betts thought it was interesting that the same species was declining in the study led by Kim and that the same species benefited from forests with old-growth characteristics, even though Betts claimed that Kim’s results were “collected independently and more rigorously” than those in the research he led in 2017.
“The earlier paper was less well done because we didn’t measure microclimate directly,” Betts said. “Our hypothesis was that microclimate buffering should work for a high proportion of the declining species. This current paper is the first time that’s been shown.”
Brenda McComb and Sarah Frey of the OSU College of Forestry and David Bell of the Forest Service’s Pacific Northwest Research Station also took part in this research, which was supported by the National Science Foundation.